ANTIFA-The Threat From Within

Just when you thought crop circles were an unexplained mystique, hold on, they are now being eclipsed by a greater phenomenon known as “historical statues.” Over night, throughout the land, statues began to appeared, and for the first time citizens, mostly millennials, began to noticed them. “Where have they come from? Who put them here?” could be heard throughout the land. As fear and outrage began to spread, millennials started to band together as a force, like in the movie “Red Dawn,” to form their own group of wolverines, to fight this evil phenomenon. Their goal was simple, destroy, and remove all statues before they spread or infect people.  But unbeknownst to the millennials, the statutes had already morphed into offensive signs , names of roads, schools, public buildings and infected many citizens, as they had came out to protect these statutes. “How will we ever be able to organize and defeat these things?” Luckily for the millennials, news sources had previously reported on a man by the name of Soros, who through one of his organizations called “Tides Foundation,” had previous experience  in organizing and financing millennials for other causes. Thanks to the skills of Soros, skills that he acquired as a young Nazi, an army of millennials, all dressed in black clothing, with a flag and clubs, started to appear wherever  statutes and rallies were found. Attacking in packs, these millennials, began swing clubs, tearing down statues and driving everyone away from them. This group became known as ANTIFA.

ANTIFA has modeled itself after the fascist “Black-Shirts” of Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s SS. Just like the Black-Shirts of yesteryears, these thugs seek to advance a political agenda through violence. Morality, ethical and democratic value are nowhere on their radar. Ironically they attempt to fool others, by claiming to be antifascist.  They have even produced a flag which states “ANTIFASCICT ACTION.”

To keep true to its fascist roots, their flag uses the colors of black and red, which is reminiscent of the evils of fascist, Nazi and other violent racist groups. Attacks on civil society, the machinery of state, Police, bystanders and anyone who has an opinion others then theirs, is fair game. This left wing group is nothing short of a terrorist organization.

ANTIFA has been sold a bill of goods, that American society under President Trump is evil. The advancement of the globalist agenda as well as the new world order has convinced these millennials that the only way forward is through a liberal agenda. The republic is under attack from within, and this group of terrorist need to be quelled. The hatred that is being displayed across the United States is an attempt to take down the Presidency of Donald Trump, a President who was elected by the people. America need to stand strong against these fascist, failure to do so will result in the destruction of the United States as it exists.




Is it now time for the United States government to re-activate its past policy on political assassination to get rid of Kim Jong-Un and his military elites? While political assassinations are today viewed as taboo, there was a time when it was part of American foreign policy, a special measure for dealing with foreign leaders whom the US determined to be problematic to their interest. Consider some notable cases such as attempts or success on Castro of Cuba, Patrice Lumumba of Zaire and Orlando Letelier of Chile. But this all changed in 1976 when President Ford outlawed this practice.  Since that time all Presidents have re-affirmed this policy and have not authorized any political assassinations, or have they?

Regardless what side you stand on in this subject, history is full of examples of individuals whom had they have been assassinated, countless lives would have been spared and the world would have been better off.  Leaders such as Hitler, Hideki Tojo and Benito Mussolini, who are responsible for the murder of millions of people and an uncalculated disaster the world has never witnessed before. Hard to argue that they deserved the same right to life that other were denied by them.  With the exception of religious objection, there is no balanced reason to have saved these individuals from assassination.  

In today’s complex and dangerous world, the tool of political assassinations is a necessary option to bring stability and security back to the world.  While I know many religious people would disagree with this statement, who could argue that the killing of Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, or Muammar Qaddafi should not have happened. These men were responsible for the murder of millions and in the end got what they deserved.  These were targeted assassinations, justified, by their own actions.  While it is not politically correct to call them assassinations, they are and are justified, let’s not get hung up on the word assassination, it was a necessary and justifiable action.

Another character who fits the mold for selection is Kim Jong-Un. His relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons, and his desire to nuke the United States, elevates him to the top of the list.  How is America to deal with this psychopath, who starves and murders his own people in the most grotesque ways, bent on nuclear ambitions to threaten the world? To continue on a policy of dialogue and appeasement, hoping the day will never come, or to wait till his missiles fly and countless of millions of Americans are killed before a response that the world would approve of is launched against him is not an option.  He has been the master of his own faith and has taken himself to this point, now is time for a response.

Let’s remember a fish rots from the head first. By politically identifying him for assassination, as well as his senior military leaders, then taking out his communications, the nation would be in disarray and not have any leadership to fall back on.  This is where China can step in with its military and assume control of North Korea, it military and nukes. This serves two purposes.  First China still has control over the area, something that it fears loosing, and now they are rid of a cancer that has destabilized the area.  For the United States, while North Korea would still remain in the hands of a communist country, China is more rational that North Korea currently is.  Also China as is Russia are both well aware for the cold war view of nuclear weapons by all serves as a mutual deterrence for use.  This is not something that Kim Jung-un would ever accept or understand. In the end America has removed its threat and sent a message to the world that irrational, psychopathic leaders will not be permitted to threaten world peace.   Purge away America.

Humanity at a Crossroad

Once again the world finds itself in front of another shrine to victims of Islamic terrorism, asking how this happened again? As in all incidents, civic leaders take to the podium to talk about a resolve to remain strong, not to be deterred by the terrorist, and the continuation of our lives as normal, as a sign of our battle against them. Nations for their part express their condolences; they seek to explain the need for more tolerance of Islam, and an accommodation of their lifestyle, which will all lead to a defeat of Islamic terrorism. This false narrative is the equivalent to laying blame at the feet of citizens, and is killing innocent people. Islamic extremism is not a sociological or societal problem rather an ideology of hate and violence with one goal, that being conversion of all to Islam upon pain of death.

Consider the many European nations who practice the above, and who have surrendered their sovereignty to the European Union’s policy of open border, flirting with extreme multiculturalism, allowing Sharia law and courts to operate, and no go zones. In many of these European countries, Islamic migrants have flooded in, from other then the intended country, Syria. The Islamic extremists have seized this opportunity to infiltrate these nations, and have been dispensing violence on a scale never before witnessed. The appeasement and setting aside of our better judgement has got to end.

Nobody is saying that all Muslims are extremist. For the most part the majority of them have left their countries of origin to come to the western world to enjoy the way we live. These individuals do not want extreme Islamist in our countries either, but because of the era of political correctness the extremist are entering, recruiting and growing in numbers. Moderate Muslims are in fear of the extremist, and there are many cases where they have reported Islamic extremist, and nothing has been done. Government’s have failed to protect the homeland and citizens, all to appease the globalist who are behind the agenda of Islam spreading. After all, conflict is good for their pocketbooks, and to date nobody has heard of any of them being victims of these terrorist.

The time has come for the world to move from a state of appeasement to assimilation of immigrants. The first course of action needs to be the rounding up of all Islamic extremists on any nations watch list, and to deport them back to their country of origins. For home-grown radicals or converts on a watch list, incarceration with a plan to de-radicalize is needed. The nations need to adopt the same procedures as is used in many US prisons to deal with gang members, which leads to them leaving the gangs. Next is to deal with the Imams in the Mosques who spew hate and violence. This can never be acceptable under any circumstance or from any religion. We need to acknowledge that the Koran does preach of hate and violence, but that has to be explained for the time it was written, and is no longer relevant to todays Muslims. The third thing that must occur is that the leaders of nations need to temper the liberal court, who are more concerned with the freedom of one person over the whole of society. Failure to act will only empower the Islamic extremist to increase their attacks and grow their numbers. Humanity and our way of life is at stake. Failure to act will mean more shrines around the world.

The Sky is Falling

Yesterday was a do or die day for humanity. Nations all around the world held there breath, as if they were waiting to see if the groundhog saw his shadow and more winter was coming. All of this suspense and attention was built around the Paris Accord on climate change, and wonders if the US would back out of it or not. No sooner had President Trump announced that he was pulling out of the Accord, and Chicken Little sprang into action proclaiming that the sky was falling. What is humanity to do now? I was so concerned with this decision that I rose early this morning, went outside to watch the unfolding devastation that President Trump had caused. To my surprise nothing, the sun’s rays were not starting fires, the oceans did not swallow up any islands and humanity remained the same. Okay someone lied.

The great hoax is now challenged by a reality check. Clearly there is division in the scientific community on climate discussions, and this division is what lends itself to the debate. One day you read an article about polar ice growing, next week polar ice is disappearing, the planet is over heating, yet summer like weather has not appeared in traditional areas, from ozone depletion to global warming and now climate change, the left has been as solid in their stance as a soggy soup sandwich. Now enough is enough, and they have been called on it. The left needs to understand that by turning down the Paris Accord, it does not mean that those on the right do not care about the environment. Nobody is advocating filling the oceans with garbage, dumping nuclear waste in landfill sites or buildings more smoke stacks to pump pollution into the environment. A balanced approach that considers all aspects of humanity is what is required, not the self serving agenda that benefits the elites while the rest of the world pays for it.

So for now, the like of Al Gore, with his private jet, that must run on unicorn farts, and who has created a cottage industry on fear mongering is beat. His elitist friends who bankroll this agenda, who also fly around on private jets, have just been dealt a dose of reality. How will they continue to profit from this hoax? The plan was a masterpiece they thought, until it was examined. The wisdom of the accord that allows China, the world’s largest polluter, 13 years before they have too complying, has been exposed. Why can’t we have 13 years? For China this represent 13 years of unlimited pollution, and we pay. Another country, India has also seized upon this opportunity, by agreeing to the accord for a small modest compensation of over two trillion dollars, guess who pays this? Does this Paris accord not sound like the Iran Nuclear Deal?

Chicken Little and all of his friends who believe the sky is falling, need to take a deep breath, you are ok. Nobody is looking to destroy the earth, just wanting to survive and live a modest life. Until the scientific community has a clear consensus on the environment, we would all be better off if we hitched our wagon to common sense and not the agenda setters, who stand to profit from more restrictions upon mankind.

For the Sake of Canada, Justin Trudeau Must Not Fight Mathew Perry

In April 2017, Canadians learned of an age-old feud that has been brewing for years between our dear leader Justin and Mathew Perry. This feud goes all the way back to their childhood days, and resurfaced again, after Mathew Perry went on TV bragging about beating Justin up as a kid. For Justin this was too much to tolerate, action was required. In response to Mathews bragging, Justin released a tweet on April 1, 2017 challenging Mathew to a rematch.

Justin’s fighting career appears to have popped up over the years. In 2012, Justin was involved in a high profile fight, when he entered the boxing ring to take on Senator Patrick Brazeau. Although a charity fight, the punches were thrown, and Justin was declared the victor. At the same time, Justin was also working on plans to set himself up as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, and then Prime Minister. Justin had been providing many suggestions to the government of the day on how to govern, and told us how he would do it if he ran the country. Now fast forward a few years and here you have Justin as Canadian Prime Minister.

One year after his victorious fight against Senator Brazeau, Justin became leader of the Liberal Party, and began his march towards Prime Minister. From 2013 onwards Justin told Canadians how he would fix our country, although nobody thought it was broken, and return us to greatness. Electoral reform, Parliamentary reform, job creations, balancing the budget, helping the middle class, tax cuts, more focus on the middle class, transparency, infrastructure investment, an end to feeding at the trough, and accountable MP. In many of these cases he even gave us specifics of what he would do, it was as if he wrote a governing for dummies handbook. He put it out there and many bought it. Today he is our dear leader.

Shortly after securing the office of Prime Minister, Canadians began to notice something was not quite right. Many of the promises that Justin made, just disappeared. Justin’s antics in the House of Commons were questionable, with Canadians wondering if this was the same man they had voted for. Even the pillars of his campaign were gone, so what happened Justin, did you just forget, or is it something else?

Know we all have come to know the danger of concussions that athletes suffer. Repeated blows to the head are nothing to smear at. Justin has engaged in the sort of activities, through boxing, where repeated punches to the head are a fact. Justin started out on a good foot promising to do great thing, but appears to have forgotten. Now I know he did not lie to us while campaigning for the Prime Ministers job, so the only thing I can conclude is that boxing has taken it toll on him. For that, Parliament needs to ensure that Justin hangs up his gloves for good, and never fight again as long as he is governing Canada. If he does not heed these words and insists on fighting Mathew Perry, only the lord knows what he will do to this country next.

Islam and Prison Radicalization – “In Your Face” Activity

Following many of the attacks in Europe and other western nations, it is often reported that the Muslim attacker(s), be they a born Muslim or convert to Islam, was radicalized in prison. While many ask how this can happen, the truth is that Muslim radicalization starts out as joining a prison gang, and their growth and radicalization is “an in your face” activity. This is unlike society, where radicalization occurs covertly to outsiders.

Having spent 30 years working frontline inside of Federal Prisons, I have witnessed the growth of these gangs, and by that I mean all gangs, their operations, strategy and power play to achieve their aims. Their activity is such an in-your-face action, that an untrained eye would assume that what they are seeing is just regular prison activity. So why is this allowed to happen? Simply put, although incarceration is to be a restriction, the reality is that these restrictions are not as limited as one would think, and in some cases their rights are more protected than honest people on the outside. Many bleeding hearts are more interested in their rights then yours.

The problem starts with society and the naive belief that prison rehabilitates. Society is sold an idea that prisons are a sort of therapeutic clinical environment where everything is strictly controlled and positive results attained and measured. Money comes from saying there is a cure, and society feels better believing it is curing someone. Prison environment is ripe for the radicalization of any group, but for Muslims it really is the tip of the spear to start the process.

The hard facts are that prison is a violent environment, and for many reason, individuals look to groups to secure their safety and in many cases their comfort. As the public may not be aware, Muslims as well as some other groups have special privileges that they are able to fall back on as recruiting tool. One such privilege is the different food they receive, from the rest of the population. To facilitate this they also have their own cooks to handle their cooking. While this might seem small, in prison where you can either eat food prepared for hundreds or thousands or food cooked for a vastly smaller number, guess who has the better food? Prayer time is another opportunity for them to gather in their gang, and this is where the power structure becomes visible. The next issue is security, and this is where the gang loyalty starts to gel them together. Your safety becomes hitched to following the gang and vice versa. It is a typical cult recruiting mentality. Prison provides the best of criminals and easiest mark for them to recruit from. In return you will be called upon to show your loyalty to them, which can include assaults, murders or any other activity they demand. Once converted and radicalized you don’t leave. Another big issue is that sometime the information sought out by prison managers, is from some Muslims who don’t understand the complexity of prison, so they provide bad information which leads to misinterpretation of rights rather than customs or likes. For example, the idea of during Ramadan, that meals have to be held in a community style fashion is often stated, but not required. Security should never be dictated by outsiders, but sadly it happens.  It is a typical tail wagging the dog scenario.

Unfortunately because of a lack of knowledge about Islam and a reliance upon Muslims to tell the organization what they have to do, this empowers the Muslim inmates, and paints the perception that they are powerful and able to get things done. No other group has this leverage over the criminal justice system. This power that they wield behind bars is viewed as an aphrodisiac to converts.

Law enforcement needs to refocus its plans priorities on the reality of what is happening inside prisons. While today issues is radicalization of Islam behind bars, next time it may be other groups.

Kim Jung-Un Last Stand

​While threats and intimidation may have worked in the past for North Korea, that ship has now sailed.  Current threats of; all out nuclear war, the eradication of South Korea, nuclear ICBM attacks on America, missile strikes on Japan, as well as the new threat of weekly missile test, are now being taken more seriously then at any other time in history. North Korea’s proclamation of advancement in nuclear and rocket capability, be they true or not, have reached an apex that the world is no longer willing to chance . American resolve could not be stronger, as Kim Jung-Un  has just made his last stand.

As successive administrations entertained the manipulation by North Korea, granting them both materialistic and financial concessions in exchange for putting aside their nuclear ambition, North Korea graciously accepted but silently continued with its nuclear plans. Mastering the art of manipulation, every year they would raise their head and rattle the world again with nuclear claims and rocket test, again gaining favors for empty promises. All the international community was able to accomplish was the postponement of the inevitable, and today we find ourselves at dateline inevitable.

It is obvious now that North Korea is on a go it alone path. Nations such as Russia and China, major supporters of North Korea have been unsuccessful in de-escalating the nuclear crises.  What once would have been a great military alliance against the west, has now turned into a nightmare for them. A megalomaniac un-nerved by the concept of mutual destructibility, something that kept the cold war parties in check, is lost on him. Negotiation are long pass the point of effectiveness.

What the world is now faced with is a potential nuclear conflict, that is sure to occur if North Korea is not dealt with. With America and her allies as the recipients of threats, the task falls to America to neutralise the problem, as all else has failed.  Realising the gravity of the situation, I am willing to bet that privately Russia and China agree that Kim Jung-Un must go.  Their recent posturing militarily is simply to protect their interest keeping the Korea’s divided after Kim Jung-Un is gone. China’s 200000 plus troops on the boarder is there to quickly move into North Korea if an American attack comes and Kim is removed. This is to  ensure primarily that North Korea remains as is, with a new puppet installed, and secondly to ensure that the North Korean military will be restrained from an all out war, giving both the Americans and Chinese a win win situation.

Kim Jung-Un will not go peacefully so options are necessary.  A limited decapitation of the leadership including it military is the best choice.  This is were China come in capable of restraining and ensuring stability. Secondly a  less favorable position would be strategic military strikes on his nuclear program, but the megalomaniac remains.  

Decision time is around the corner, and the safest bet for a limited armed conflict resides with the decapitation of leadership plan. While pubically the mantra is to give negotiations another chance, realistically 20 plus years of this cat and mouse game has been a failure, time to spring the trap.

Put me in Coach, America Returns to the Game

The last eight years has seen America sitting on the bench while many players in the International Arena have risen to prominence and profited from a “laissez faire” attitude of American foreign policy. Sweeping away American footprints was more important then displaying their presence. But that all changed in November 2016, when Americans clearly said “Put me in Coach,” and a return to the game it is.

The emboldening of rogue nations and their proxies did not occur by accident. These entities saw a nation on bended knee, more interested in apologizing for everything that occurred in the past, and fearing making the same mistakes again. America’s presence in the world was shrinking. Announcements of scaled back action were now everywhere. Everybody with an axe to grind only had to wait till America vacated, and retribution flowed. Iran and its nuclear ambition-in motion, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood-Arab spring, ISIS-from rag tag to a national threat, North Korea-nuclear ambition, Terrorism-domestically and internationally, Political correctness-failing to label threats for what they actually are, etc. The end result is a world that is less stable and ripe for violence.

2017 is seeing a reset of the failed policies and practices of years gone by. Decisive action on the reversal of American footprints is in full swing. America will no longer sit on the sidelines as atrocoties occur around the world, and useless votes of condemenation are the only response from the international community.  Syria was a wake-up call to all who thought it would be the same old, same old as usual. From this point forward appeasement is over, and America means what it says. Regimes, and their proxies that threaten America or world stability are living on borrowed time. While America prefers partnership in dealing with world events, if all fails, America will go it alone. The terrorists no longer have the comfort of knowing every move and preparing for it. Rogue nations such as North Korea, are living on borrowed time which can now be measured in days rather then years, as had been the practice. America is back in the game and playing for keeps.

While many choose to attack the President, all have to remember he inhearated a world that has never been so divided and complex as it is now.  It is only through strength, decisiveness and  a commitment to act if need be, will the world start to calm down.


Sale, Sale, Sale, Everything Must go!!!!

By now Canadians are starting to get the picture that Justin’s Liberal Government is not working on behalf of Canadians, rather for the globalist.  The days of our National Government investing in our country, maintaining a surplus, tax-breaks for middle income families, and placing Canadians first, is now over.  Everything is up for sale, sky the limit, pleasing the globalist is the priority.  As taxpayers our role is simple, don’t complain, comply and keep paying.

Canada elected a wolf in sheep’s clothing.  Usurping the wishes and powers of parliament by manipulating the democratic process to turn democracy on itself is his action plan.  The dismantling and rolling back of democracy has begun, and the globalist could not be happier with Justin loyalty to them.

Canadians missed the cry of the wolf, when in campaigning for the Prime Minister’s job, Justin talked about incurring a debt, rather than maintain the previous government’s policy of a surplus. Justin told Canadians that his government planned to borrow 10 billion dollars per year, over four years, and that money was going to be used to stimulate the economy and job growth.  After all he said money was cheap to borrow, so why not?  But in secret Justin already had other plans for all this money, and Canada did not figure into it. What Canadians have witnessed, is that billions of dollars that were borrowed, was given away to other nations, agendas, and let’s not forget the master globalists at the United Nations.  Canadians are receiving zero return on investment, instead a debt that will haunt us for many decades. It will not be until 2055 before Canadians see another surplus.

The next step came in the passing of Motion 103. This motion limits free speech, and places Islam as a priority in Canadian law, over all other religions. Although polls showed that 70% of Canadians were opposed to it, the government went ahead and had it passed. The agenda of destroying our democracy is more important, after all it gives government more power and control.

The latest attack on our democracy comes in what they are calling Parliamentary reform.  If you think parliament was dysfunctional before watch out.  There first step in this process is to limit debate in the house and committee.  Limiting debate robs Canadians of a voice and ensures closure to force any agenda through.  Next comes the real slippery and slimy part of politics.  The liberals are now looking to make their work week only four days, with every Friday off.  I am sure hard working Canadians appreciate this disgusting move.   Also to strictly control and protect Justin, they are also proposing that Justin only has to appear once a week in the house of common to answer questions for the 45 minutes during question period.  Now I know many Canadians will be upset with the way the Liberals are governing, but they do not want to hear about it.  To protect their egos and ensure they only hear positive messages, they are looking at creating a new law for Harassment of MP’s only.  I guess the current criminal harassment laws that we have to live with are not strong enough for their liking. So in the future if an elected and accountable MP feels his feelings have been hurt, he can cry Harassment.  How sweet, now just like Islam they will have their own specific law for themselves.

To liberals nothing is sacred or beyond reproach.  Our rights that we once cherished are being eroded all to appease the globalist. Justin’s yard sale continues. 

Re-Engineering of Canadian Values

Today the House of Commons took the first step in re-engineering Canadian values to appease a vocal Islamic minority in Canada.  Motion 103, raised by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid, of Mississauga, Ontario a new Member of Parliament and a recent new citizen of Canada passed 201 to 91.  The green light for Sharia Law, no go zones, special prayer services, censorship of media-removing any disparaging statements about Islam, and the granting of special status and protection to Islam has begun.

Facts and reality will now be replaced with shouts of racism, bigotry, and the threat of prosecution for anyone talking bad about Islam.  Rather than religion being accepted for what it is, an Ideology, a belief, or a philosophy, Islam has now been placed on a pedestal, looking down on all others.  Special status outside of the guarantees of the Constitution of Canada have just been added for Islam.

But this forced upon Canadian law, lacks legitimacy.  As polls show, and we know the governments watch polls, over 70% of Canadians are not in favor of this motion, but it was forced on us anyway. The importance of legitimacy is that laws with legitimacy are followed by the masses.  Murder, assaults, speeding laws, or basic traffic rules, these are followed because the masses believe that the law is for the benefit of all therefore it has legitimacy.  But Motion 103 is not like that, it serves only Islam.

There is a reality to Islam that this motion seeks to quell.  As we all know, Islam is the religion and Muslims are its follower.  Anyone can understand laws preventing people from tarnishing a group such as Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Hindu, etc. with cruel statements.  This affect the individual.  But Islam is not a person.  The reality of Islam and Muslims are clearly separated and evident every day in the media.  Everyone know that the vast majority of Muslims are good people. Just like every other race, Muslims have criminals amongst them. The real problem comes from what Motion 103 is trying to protect and that is Islam and the struggle it has within itself.  For example some Imam extremist preach death to non-believers, Jews, and many others in the mosque. They also treats women as less then human, allows pedophilia (through the marriage of kids to adults), and cite this is the way of Islam.  Unfortunately this portion of Islam is on a daily killing spree, violently murdering, attacking and resorting to a state of nature by vicious animalistic actions. Other portions of Islam do the opposite and oppose the extremist. Remember Islam kills more Muslims then any another group. Islam is at a juncture and a struggle from within, and todays passing of Motion 103 is a slap in the face to Moderate Islamic Muslims who have come here for a better life and to leave behind the oppressive ways.

Canadian need to be mindful of all these politicians who thumbed their noses at us and remember them on Election Day.  These politicians need to be targeted for defeat in any election.  They have made their choice, of siding with extremist ways against the Canadian people.

The following is a list of MP and how they voted on Motion 103. It was taken from the National Post dated March 23, 2017. If your MP name is not there,  they were either not in the house or abstained from the vote.

nay/ Aboultaif nay/ Albas nay/ Albrecht yea/ Aldag yea/ Alleslev nay/ Allison nay/ Ambrose yea/ Amos paired/pairé Anandasangaree nay/ Anderson nay/ Arnold yea/ Arseneault yea/ Arya yea/ Ashton yea/ Ayoub yea/ Bagnell nay/ Barlow nay/ Barsalou-Duval yea/ Baylis nay/ Beaulieu yea/ Beech yea/ Bennett yea/ Benson nay/ Bergen nay/ Bernier nay/ Berthold nay/ Bezan yea/ Bibeau yea/ Bittle yea/ Blaikie yea/ Blair nay/ Blaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis) yea/ Blaney (North Island—Powell River) nay/ Block yea/ Boissonnault yea/ Bossio nay/ Boucher yea/ Boutin-Sweet nay/ Brassard yea/ Bratina yea/ Breton yea/ Brison yea/ Brosseau yea/ Caesar-Chavannes nay/ Calkins yea/ Cannings yea/ Caron yea/ Carr nay/ Carrie yea/ Casey (Charlottetown) yea/ Casey (Cumberland—Colchester) yea/ Chagger yea/ Champagne yea/ Chan yea/ Chen yea/ Chong yea/ Choquette yea/ Christopherson nay/ Clarke nay/ Clement nay/ Cooper yea/ Cormier yea/ Cullen yea/ Cuzner yea/ Dabrusin yea/ Damoff yea/ Davies yea/ DeCourcey nay/ Deltell yea/ Dhaliwal yea/ Dhillon yea/ Di Iorio nay/ Diotte nay/ Doherty yea/ Donnelly nay/ Dreeshen yea/ Drouin yea/ Dubourg yea/ Duguid yea/ Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona) yea/ Duncan (Etobicoke North) yea/ Dusseault yea/ Duvall yea/ Dzerowicz yea/ Easter nay/ Eglinski yea/ Ehsassi yea/ El-Khoury yea/ Ellis yea/ Erskine-Smith yea/ Eyking yea/ Eyolfson nay/ Falk nay/ Fast yea/ Fergus yea/ Fillmore nay/ Finley yea/ Finnigan yea/ Fisher yea/ Fonseca yea/ Fragiskatos yea/ Fraser (Central Nova) yea/ Fraser (West Nova) yea/ Freeland yea/ Fry yea/ Fuhr nay/ Gallant yea/ Garrison nay/ Généreux yea/ Gerretsen nay/ Gill nay/ Gladu nay/ Godin yea/ Goldsmith-Jones yea/ Goodale yea/ Gould nay/ Gourde yea/ Graham yea/ Grewal nay/ Harder yea/ Hardie yea/ Harvey yea/ Hehr nay/ Hoback yea/ Holland yea/ Housefather yea/ Hughes yea/ Hussen yea/ Hutchings yea/ Iacono nay/ Jeneroux yea/ Johns yea/ Joly yea/ Jones yea/ Jordan yea/ Jowhari yea/ Julian yea/ Kang nay/ Kelly nay/ Kent yea/ Khalid yea/ Khera nay/ Kitchen nay/ Kmiec yea/ Kwan nay/ Lake yea/ Lametti yea/ Lamoureux yea/ Lapointe yea/ Lauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation) nay/ Lauzon (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) nay/ Lebel yea/ LeBlanc yea/ Lebouthillier yea/ Lefebvre nay/ Leitch yea/ Lemieux yea/ Leslie yea/ Levitt nay/ Liepert yea/ Lightbound nay/ Lobb yea/ Lockhart yea/ Longfield yea/ Ludwig nay/ Lukiwski yea/ MacAulay (Cardigan) yea/ MacGregor nay/ MacKenzie yea/ MacKinnon (Gatineau) nay/ Maguire yea/ Malcolmson yea/ Maloney yea/ Massé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) yea/ Masse (Windsor West) yea/ Mathyssen yea/ May (Cambridge) yea/ May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) nay/ McCauley (Edmonton West) yea/ McCrimmon yea/ McDonald yea/ McGuinty yea/ McKay yea/ McKenna yea/ McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) nay/ McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo) yea/ McLeod (Northwest Territories) yea/ Mendès yea/ Mendicino yea/ Miller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs) yea/ Monsef paired/pairé Moore yea/ Morrissey nay/ Motz yea/ Mulcair yea/ Murray yea/ Nantel yea/ Nassif nay/ Nater yea/ Nault nay/ Nicholson yea/ O’Connell yea/ Oliphant yea/ Oliver yea/ O’Regan nay/ O’Toole yea/ Ouellette yea/ Paradis nay/ Paul-Hus nay/ Pauzé yea/ Peschisolido yea/ Peterson yea/ Petitpas Taylor yea/ Philpott yea/ Picard nay/ Poilievre yea/ Poissant yea/ Quach yea/ Qualtrough yea/ Rankin yea/ Ratansi nay/ Reid nay/ Rempel nay/ Richards yea/ Rioux nay/ Ritz yea/ Robillard yea/ Rodriguez yea/ Romanado yea/ Rota yea/ Rudd yea/ Ruimy yea/ Rusnak yea/ Sahota yea/ Saini yea/ Sajjan yea/ Sangha yea/ Sansoucy yea/ Sarai nay/ Saroya yea/ Scarpaleggia nay/ Scheer yea/ Schiefke nay/ Schmale yea/ Schulte yea/ Serré yea/ Sgro yea/ Sheehan nay/ Shields nay/ Shipley yea/ Sidhu (Brampton South) yea/ Sidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon) yea/ Simms nay/ Sopuck yea/ Sorbara nay/ Sorenson yea/ Spengemann yea/ Stanton nay/ Ste-Marie yea/ Stetski yea/ Stewart nay/ Strahl nay/ Stubbs nay/ Sweet yea/ Tabbara yea/ Tan yea/ Tassi nay/ Tilson yea/ Tootoo nay/ Trost yea/ Trudel nay/ Van Kesteren nay/ Van Loan yea/ Vandal yea/ Vandenbeld yea/ Vaughan nay/ Vecchio nay/ Viersen yea/ Virani nay/ Wagantall nay/ Warawa nay/ Warkentin nay/ Waugh nay/ Webber yea/ Weir yea/ Whalen yea/ Wilkinson yea/ Wilson-Raybould nay/ Wong yea/ Wrzesnewskyj yea/ Young nay/ Yurdiga yea/ Zahid nay/ Zimmer