No Identification Required, Vote Away

If you had any doubt in your mind about the destructiveness of Justin’s liberals, hang on, they are at it again.   Democratic Institution Minister Maryam Monsef, remember her, the Cabinet minister who could not remember where she was born, has just delivered the next blow to Canadian Democracy.

The law requiring voters showing up at polling stations to have appropriate photo identification is offensive to liberals. A roll back of Bill C-50 is what liberals feel Canada needs. Justin’s government is making it so that anyone showing up to vote without identification, will still be allowed to vote if they have someone from their own ridding vouching for them, how nice. I guess it truly is all about sunny ways.

In the world of liberalism, nobody lies, misleads, falsifies or is dishonest, and the liberals are proving it to us, leading by example. They have not lied to Canadians about the debt increase only going to be 10 billion dollars a year, it was just a small accounting error. On job creation, Justin did create a couple of jobs, he had nannies hired for his kids. On infrastructure, he has given out billions of dollars to help 3rd world nations, just not Canada yet, he is probably waiting till he gets us to 3rd world status. But they have been showing us the importance of friends, such as the type that can go to lunch with a cabinet minister for thousands of dollars a plate.  Great job Justin!

But I wonder if liberal ways work in the world we live in.  If stopped by police and asked for identification, I wonder if I can call a friend to vouch for me.  How about at the Post Office, trying to pick-up a delivery, can a friend just vouch for me?   We all know that a friend is not good enough for them at the border, for some reason they want a passport, maybe Justin’s liberals can send a memo to all border crossings that vouching is good enough.

Voting is one of the greatest privileges in our country.  All that is asked is that you be a citizen of the country, be of proper voting age, and have proper identification. These foolish rules have something to do with voter fraud, something the liberals do not believe will happen. Are they being naive in thinking voter fraud will not happen, or is there a bigger agenda.  I am betting that this is part of the bigger picture for the global agenda.  Consider immigration.  Open borders, bring in as many new immigrants as possible, especially around election time, called securing votes, and now they vote, with or without identification.  How about the burka controversy, no longer any reason to see the persons face, just vouch for them. The number one goal of globalist is to weaken democracy through liberalism, and their number one tool is immigration.   Justin’s liberals are on board 100%.

Why is our elected government not listening to the people?  Why do they choose to ignore Canada and Canadians and favor the globalist agendas?  Have Canadians asked for such a change in voting laws?  Have you ever heard anybody say it would be a good idea to just go in and vote without proving who you are, or even if you are a citizen, or resident of the ridding you are voting in?  Probably not, but you see Justin’s Liberals don’t care what Canadians think.  Canadians as well as all westerns hemispheric people believe that there are legitimate reasons to provide photo identification and do so without thinking.  Now thanks to the globalist agenda the most sacred part of our free world, voting in a democracy, is being manipulated and abused.  We the people will not forget!

Advertisements

Well it’s Official, the Trudeau Government is Ruining Family Trips to the Zoo

It used to be that a trip to the zoo was a fun time for the whole family, but now thanks to the Trudeau government that fun is taking a very serious turn towards political correctness.  If the liberals have their way, and changes are made to make everything gender neutral, no more males and females, how will a trip to the zoo go?

Consider this.  No longer being able to call a deer a buck or doe; a bear a boar or sow, a bee a drone or queen; a bird a cock or hen; bison a bull or cow, a cat a tom or queen; a chicken a rooster or hen; a goat a billy or nanny; a goose a Goose or gander; a horse a stud/stallion or dam/mare; a lion a lion or lioness; etc.  What will we do?

As silly as the above sounds, is as silly as the Trudeau governments plan to make everything gender neutral. We are a planet with males and females, there is no legislation that any government can pass that will ever remove that reality.  The Garden of Eden had man and women, remember Adam and Eve, or are they going to be edited out of books also.  Most dictators and despots do rewrite history to suit their agenda.

The Liberal extremist on the left, and I have to say extremist, because who in their right mind does not believe that we on this earth are males and females, are bent on destroying the reality of the world we live in. The narrative for this rebellious action is being pushed by the elites and globalist so as to divide mankind for their own greedy purpose. They float the ideas in their corporate media, that they own, and sit back and watch mankind dissolve into their hands.

The cry for equality use to be for acceptance, and for the most part, people in Canada do accept others for who they are. Be who you want, love who you want and dress the way you want, most people don’t care.  But to now try to legislate out of existence, the very basic of human life, male or female is absurd, besides how will I explain my next trip to the zoo.

Political Correctness on Steroids 

Thanks to the liberal media, political correctness is in hyper drive racing to a corner of your life to set you straight.

Everything you say, do or think now has the potential to offend someone.  The recent US election has exemplified this, thanks to the media with their agenda setting elites.

There is nothing that a President Elect Trump could do, that would not offend some to the point of protest and riots. If he rescued kids from a burning school bus, some would be offended that he tied up traffic.  He takes his family to super, with his security detail, and the media is offended because they did not get a chance to watch him eat. He picks his cabinet and others come out against them citing things that may or may not of happened 30 years ago.  The righteous left have hurt feelings.

Recently in Kingston Ontario, some Queen’s University students held a party, off campus, where attending students had to dress in clothing depicting different ethnic groups. Needless to say the liberal media has lost their minds. So offended are some that expulsion from society is the only solution. How dare young people have harmless fun. The pain the left feels is debilitating. So who was hurt by this party? Nobody lost a job, financial penalty, loss of liberty or physical abuse. At no time was racism being promoted or people forced to attend or watch. The only ones playing the race card are the righteous on the left.

It must be nice to be as perfect as the righteous left.  Anybody else who opens up their closet and looks  back on their life would find at least one thing that they have done or said that if anybody else found out about, they would be embarrassed.  But you know something, thoese on the right understand that and are willing to let people live their own lives as long as it does not threaten the common good.

The righteous left needs to take stalk of the reality of our world we live in today. Stop being influenced by the agenda setters and return to the center of reality.  Not everything in life needs to be a battle.  Enjoy life the way it was meant to be, and if those that are truly bent on hurting others pop up, collectively society will deal with them.

Sex Offenders Transferred to Minimun Security, The process.

The transfer process for sex offenders from higher security to lower security, including minimum security occurs in the following way.

Upon entering federal custody in Canada, a Parole Officer is assigned to the inmate, who then performs an intake assessment.  The Parole Officer goes over file information, including judge’s reason for sentencing, police reports, court transcripts and all other relevant documents.  The Parole officer will also interview the inmate and then draft a Correctional plan.  The Correctional Plan is a road map, of what the inmate must do if they plan on being granted transfer to lower security, community contact, statutory release or eventually parole aspirations.  The correctional plan includes issues like maintain family contact, educational upgrading, programs such as sex offender programs, living without violence, cog-skills, and all other identified programs that the Correctional Service of Canada offers to address the inmate(s) needs.

The next thing the inmate has to address is what is called a risk assessment.  This issues addresses, institutional adjustment concerns, escape risk and threat to the public safety.  The rating for this is Low, Medium, and High.

Institutional adjustment concerns encompasses, being charged free, no behavioral issues, following correctional plan, no intelligence concerns, no security concerns.  These are all measurable things. 

Escape risk concerns issues such as if they have the ability to escape, outside influences, have tried to escape before, intelligence suggest they may try to escape, or are high profile. These are very much subjective.

Threat to public safety, for the most part, is subjective.  Unless there is something tangible such as threatening victims or witnesses, it cannot be anything else but subjective. The risk is then examined to determine how low it is and can it be managed in a less secure environment.

The process starts with the sex offender submitting an application to transfer to lower security.  The parole officer completes a progress summary report, either recommending or not recommending the transfer. Next the Manager Assessment and Intervention (MAI) either support or writes a dissenting opinion.  From there it goes to the warden who has the final say.  This transfer is what is called warden’s decision.

From this process a sex offender, if he follows along, can find himself in a minimum-security prison eventually, back in community contact.  It is impossible to determine how long this process can take, or how short a time it takes.  It is my personal opinion that if they have to go to minimum security, where they have access to society that they be made to wear electronic monitoring.  As others have reported these monitoring can be programmed to alarm if these sex offenders go near certain areas.  Remember we have no cure for sex offenders, so we have to put tight controls on their movement.  My preference would be that they never go beyond a medium security, and once released they go on a registry as the government is planning.

Society has to protect the vulnerable from the predators

Transfer

The transfer process for sex offenders from higher security to lower security, including minimum security occurs in the following way.

Upon entering federal custody in Canada, a Parole Officer is assigned to the inmate, who then performs an intake assessment.  The Parole Officer goes over file information, including judge’s reason for sentencing, police reports, court transcripts and all other relevant documents.  The Parole officer will also interview the inmate and then draft a Correctional plan.  The Correctional Plan is a road map, of what the inmate must do if they plan on being granted transfer to lower security, community contact, statutory release or eventually parole aspirations.  The correctional plan includes issues like maintain family contact, educational upgrading, programs such as sex offender programs, living without violence, cog-skills, and all other identified programs that the Correctional Service of Canada offers to address the inmate(s) needs.

The next thing the inmate has to address is what is called a risk assessment.  This issues addresses, institutional adjustment concerns, escape risk and threat to the public safety.  The rating for this is Low, Medium, and High.

Institutional adjustment concerns encompasses, being charged free, no behavioral issues, following correctional plan, no intelligence concerns, no security concerns.  These are all measurable things. 

Escape risk concerns issues such as if they have the ability to escape, outside influences, have tried to escape before, intelligence suggest they may try to escape, or are high profile. These are very much subjective.

Threat to public safety, for the most part, is subjective.  Unless there is something tangible such as threatening victims or witnesses, it cannot be anything else but subjective. The risk is then examined to determine how low it is and can it be managed in a less secure environment.

The process starts with the sex offender submitting an application to transfer to lower security.  The parole officer completes a progress summary report, either recommending or not recommending the transfer. Next the Manager Assessment and Intervention (MAI) either support or writes a dissenting opinion.  From there it goes to the warden who has the final say.  This transfer is what is called warden’s decision.

From this process a sex offender, if he follows along, can find himself in a minimum-security prison eventually, back in community contact.  It is impossible to determine how long this process can take, or how short a time it takes.  It is my personal opinion that if they have to go to minimum security, where they have access to society that they be made to wear electronic monitoring.  As others have reported these monitoring can be programmed to alarm if these sex offenders go near certain areas.  Remember we have no cure for sex offenders, so we have to put tight controls on their movement.  My preference would be that they never go beyond a medium security, and once released they go on a registry as the government is planning.

Society has to protect the vulnerable from the predators

Sex Offenders in Community Correctional Centers with access to Community Gyms

As stated in my previous blog, I submitted an access to information to Corrections Canada to find out the percentage of sex offenders in CCC’s, and how many of them have access to gyms in the community, walk by schools to get to these gyms and gyms that have a daycare at them.  

This morning I received a call from Corrections Canada.  The first thing I was reminded about was the $5.00 fee for my request to be processed, which I informed the individual it was in the mail with the original request form.  The next part is more troubling, the Corrections Canada rep told me that the only way they could find out the information about sex offenders going to community gyms, would be to have those sex offenders in CCC’s files reviewed. He wanted to advise me that this would take lots of time to find out and would be very expensive for me. I was glad he called to inform me of this information, as it could get very expensive.

The message I get out of Corrections Canada’s response is that they do not know and would have to investigate to find out.  As a parent and community member this does not sit well with me.  I expected 100% compliance on issues that affect vulnerable members of society, but right now I am not sure what percentage of compliance there is.  But can there be another reason for the response.  It is very possible that this has never been thought about before.  Maybe Corrections Canada simply overlooked the issue of sex offender going to these areas were vulnerable member of society often go. After all it is a big organization, and dealing with sex offenders is a complicated issue.  

So how do we address the issue?  In the first place the protection of vulnerable members of society is the priority.  If Corrections Canada has not thought of this before, then we need to ask them the question, and if it is overlooked, we have to have it addressed.  After all it is about the protection of vulnerable members of society.  So to find out the answer I will e-mail a copy of this blog to the commissioner of Corrections Canada as well as other senior members and ask them the question.  I will relay their response when I receive it, and if it is something that is a new issue, then I know they will fix it.  

Stay tuned, but once again this is another example of why we need to have electronic monitoring on all sex offenders.

Sex Offender Programing

The attached link is from the Correctional Service of Canada’s web site, Correctional Program department, and is about sex offender programming provided by CSC.

http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/prgrm/cor-pro-2009-eng.shtml#_Toc231830457

After reading the program description, decide for yourself, if after a sex offender takes this course, would you feel comfortable with them moving into your community without added protection, or is the program enough to make you feel safe.  Also consider that when one of these sex offenders who has taken the program, escapes, or does not report to his community parole officer, the Police in the community always lists them as dangerous.  Never do they say, “Don’t worry they took a sex offender program.”

Of interest is that the program is divided into intensity levels of High, Moderate of Low intensity, and let’s not forget about the maintenance program that is often suggested. I for one do not fell that any convicted sex offender, still under sentence, has any place in the community until warrant expire, and then they need to be placed on a trackable database, for all to monitor.  Right now they are in our community, attending community events, and there is very little monitoring on them.  The focus appears to be on the rights of the sex offender and not on the rights of the most vulnerable members of society.

Again review this material and you decide.

Criminals Voting in Federal Elections

Unfortunately in Canada, the rights of criminals sentenced to federal prison are really not curtailed, as one would expect.  Let’s look at the most elementary of democratic rights, the right to vote.  While most Canadians would assume that once you have crossed the line far enough to earn a federal prison sentence, that the wheels of justice would now set down your future, with restrictions, clearly indicating society displeasure with you. After all they have shown society that they do not care about its rules and what it means to be a responsible person, so why enjoy what we enjoy.  Remember that even the most despicable of human beings, a child rapist and murder, are today allowed the same basic right to vote that the rest of us, who live a law-abiding life receive.

Is there something wrong with this picture? There has to be a level that once crossed, society says enough and it starts to impose more drastic restriction upon you.  I am not talking about those sentenced to provincial time, 2 years less a day, but rather those who have graduated to the big league and now are doing federal time. If you can’t live in society as the rest of us do, then why should you have a say in how society runs, via voting.  It’s time to end the vote for federal criminals.

Sex Offender Numbers in Community Correctional Centres

Today I received part of my original access to information request from Corrections Canada (CSC), asking for the number of sex offenders in Community Correctional Centers (CCC) on stat release, with residency conditions.  The answer from Corrections Canada, based on a snap shot taken on October 6, 2013 is 25 %.  That represents one in four inmates in CCC are sex offenders.

Let’s look at why they are released to a CCC on residency condition.  The answer is simple, it is because they are too volatile to be released without conditions. Doesn’t sound like the neighbor anyone wants, now does it.  Also remember that none of these sex offenders are cured so they still require structure and supervision; so why hurriedly place society at risk by releasing them back into community contact before warrant expire.  Consider this, when you lose your license for impaired driving for one year, the system does not give it back to you after 2/3 of your sentence.  Are we in society not correct to assume that when a sex offender is removed off the street for a time period imposed by a court, that they will not be back on the street till that time is served?  Are victims and society not owed this, I think so. So what the rush?  Remember they have committed one of the most despicable crimes, so why give them any breaks to get out soon.

A CCC is not really a prison. While they fall under the authority of the Correctional Service of Canada, they are just a glorified hotel staffed on the evening shift and mornings by non-CSC uniform staff.  As you might not know inmates in these places are even allowed to keep cars or motorcycles on the premise if they own them or buy them.  Not sounding much like a prison is it.

Victims and society are owed better than this.  Sex offenders committed the crime and they need to pay what society asks of them.  Zero tolerance for despicable crimes. Let’s keep sex offenders in no less than a medium security prison.  We owe it to the victims and vulnerable members of society

Sex Offenders beyond the watchful eye of Correctional Officers

How safe is our communities, when Community Correctional Centers (CCC), have absolutely no Corrections Canada (CSC) employees, specifically Correctional Officers, working in these facilities after 4 pm daily?  Now remember, CSC stated that 25% of the population in CCC facilities are sex offenders.

Now lets look ahead to the end of 2014, when CSC will be closing its Hamilton CCC, an internal message not yet released to the Canadian public says.  The impact that this will have on other facilities is that they will have to pick up the bed numbers, thus meaning more sex offenders in local CCC without proper security.

Is this something we should be worried about?  You bet.  The reality is that Correctional Officers are held to a higher standard then any contracted security company will be.  Correctional Officers are specifically trained, have more authority over inmates, are federal peace officers, and are specifically trained to deal with federal offenders. Their duties are based on public security, not dollars. Private security companies are in business to make money, this is their bottom line.  No private security company is equal to Federal Correctional Officers in their powers, training, or mandate.

Putting it all together spells danger for the Canadian public.  More sex offenders in local communities, and no security to watch over them, a dangerous mix.  It is time to rethink the release of sex offenders into CCC, since they are still at risk to reoffend as they are not cured, and keep them behind the walls of a prison, not in a motel like setting